Why Sotomayor is right about "wise Latina woman" superiority
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't ."
This has caused a huge uproar among conservative and even moderate politicians, to the point of calling her a racist. And I don't see enough liberal politicians explaining why she's right. Lots of people say she misspoke, but she didn't. She's right on the money.
Why?
Everyone who lives in the US is perfectly aware of the white male perspective. Everyone knows what white males think about every single fucking thing in the political, social, sexual, artistic, scientific, and religious spheres. There's no way that Sotomayor, a woman who was educated and excelled in white male bastions such as Princeton and Yale, could have missed being indoctrinated in those points of view.
The reverse can't be said of white males knowing anything about being Latina and female. White males can go their whole lives not knowing or caring about such things, and never be hampered in their careers or their social lives as a result.
This is white male privilege.
People who are privileged not only don't understand the difference between their point of view and that of others, they often don't even realize there is or could be a rational difference. They literally do not know what they are missing, because the culture doesn't show those missing parts. If you don't live those parts, or you don't seek them out, they are invisible. And it's hard to effectively judge people who live those lives if you've never seen them before.
No one would want literal space aliens judging our lives — loads of pop culture "aliens meet real people" stories like the Star Trek series and Mork and Mindy illustrate how beings without life experience have to go through a lot of work to understand how those unlike themselves actually function.
That's why Americans not speaking English, or "Black English," is so threatening. If the white male experience isn't universally understood, it loses a lot of its power.
I can go along with a universal experience of US culture. But I don't want it to be based on white male culture. I want it to be based on principles that a particular set of white males started us out with and that people of every kind have refined — the pursuit of happiness, the bill of rights, freedom and justice. We started with a gem in the rough, and the Supreme Court is tasked with finding clarity, cutting the gem so that it shines for everyone, in all directions.
And I think a self-aware Latina woman is extremely likely to be able to bring out facets in this gem that whites and males are going to have a harder time finding.
This has caused a huge uproar among conservative and even moderate politicians, to the point of calling her a racist. And I don't see enough liberal politicians explaining why she's right. Lots of people say she misspoke, but she didn't. She's right on the money.
Why?
Everyone who lives in the US is perfectly aware of the white male perspective. Everyone knows what white males think about every single fucking thing in the political, social, sexual, artistic, scientific, and religious spheres. There's no way that Sotomayor, a woman who was educated and excelled in white male bastions such as Princeton and Yale, could have missed being indoctrinated in those points of view.
The reverse can't be said of white males knowing anything about being Latina and female. White males can go their whole lives not knowing or caring about such things, and never be hampered in their careers or their social lives as a result.
This is white male privilege.
People who are privileged not only don't understand the difference between their point of view and that of others, they often don't even realize there is or could be a rational difference. They literally do not know what they are missing, because the culture doesn't show those missing parts. If you don't live those parts, or you don't seek them out, they are invisible. And it's hard to effectively judge people who live those lives if you've never seen them before.
No one would want literal space aliens judging our lives — loads of pop culture "aliens meet real people" stories like the Star Trek series and Mork and Mindy illustrate how beings without life experience have to go through a lot of work to understand how those unlike themselves actually function.
That's why Americans not speaking English, or "Black English," is so threatening. If the white male experience isn't universally understood, it loses a lot of its power.
I can go along with a universal experience of US culture. But I don't want it to be based on white male culture. I want it to be based on principles that a particular set of white males started us out with and that people of every kind have refined — the pursuit of happiness, the bill of rights, freedom and justice. We started with a gem in the rough, and the Supreme Court is tasked with finding clarity, cutting the gem so that it shines for everyone, in all directions.
And I think a self-aware Latina woman is extremely likely to be able to bring out facets in this gem that whites and males are going to have a harder time finding.



The language thing - it had never quite clicked for me before why so many people are SO threatened by people speaking another language, and I think you've pinpointed it. Thanks!
(To remove some of the randomness of this comment: Hi! I've been reading for a bit; I think I first came over from Hoyden About Town.)
Reply to this
Columbia College Chicago is having an exhibition that focuses on Quinceaneras that I think your blog readers might be interested in hearing and/or writing about. Check out http://www.artseenchicago.blogspot.com/ to get the details and post it for your readers. Please contact Elizabeth Burke-Dain at 312.369.8695 for more information.
Reply to this
Sorry, I just thought you might want to know about this show since it deals with issues relating to young Latinas. We are just getting started with our social media efforts and still a bit clumsy. Sorry if we caused any problems.
Reply to this
Hi! I found you via Pandagon, and was intrigued by your writing. You are right on the money, and I'm exhausted from trying to explain to my white male compadres why they aren't the end all be all of human existence.
The fact is that people in power don't want to share it. This is a concept that needs to be covered, because it's at the core of so many other issues in our society.
Reply to this
Thanks for the good words.
Yes, people in power don't want to share it. You can only go so far in saying that "it's better for everyone" or "this isn't a zero-sum game." Even if it's not zero-sum, losing default to power is a loss of power. There's no way to sugar-coat it.
Reply to this